Vsan vs nutanix reddit. Lose an entire disk group.
Vsan vs nutanix reddit CloudXC The only thing I'd give Nutanix the edge on is support. P. This keeps you within the ecosystem without running up the costs in a crazy way. The trade off is that every SSD in the system needs to be higher endurance Mixed Use (around 5 DWPD endurance), because each SSD sees a much higher write load vs. Nutanix pioneered the HCI market, modernizing IT design and operations via a web-scale, distributed cloud architecture using off-the-shelf servers to run business-critical workloads, cloud-native, and AI applications. AKA Move the File Shares on Windows, Nutanix, and VSAN to NetApp AFF C400 system. So make sure you use it all. I personally loathe Nutanix and haven't seen a lot of value in what they're offering compared to other HCI vendors in the last few years. Also, a robust alternative is the StarWind HCA solution. This why I find that Nutanix is usually more expensive. I feel nutanix has advantages in VXRail is pre-engineered vSAN with better management. (Post will be removed) Keep it civil. Later version of vmware 7 now includes the cluster vsan shutdown wizard. My questions are: 14 votes, 13 comments. No hardware replacement is required for 2-node HCL HA setup over C6320 you have. After some demo calls, they went with Starwind. Thoughts Consider reading his blog about the differences between Nutanix and VMware. This Infrastructure Manager writes, "We looked briefly at alternatives, but nothing stood out like vSAN. The networking does not need to be segmented like vSAN does, and IIRC separating out that network can mess with the CVM networking. So our SMB dream of having low-end AMD servers full If you are looking for a cheap storage expansion for file server and archive purposes you may want to look at Nutanix Objects in conjunction with Nutanix Files. Both platforms will keep copy data for integrity spread across all nodes in the cluster, and in the event of a disk failure or node, ensure that due to that failure, you have a working system still. This Storage and Virtualization Engineer writes, With linked clones dedupe isn't quite as important and all of the solutions (VSAN vs XtremIO) are on even footing. I have 10Gb between nodes and vCenter notes that, but doesn't prevent anything from working. The only missing pricing component on the A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Without Nutanix, you'd have to use vSAN for all the nodes in the cluster to see other node(s) storage. I have built 50 servers on our Nutanix cluster running AHV and everything including HA works just fine. No question. VSAN has a strict Hardware compatibility list and there's a good chance that your existing servers won't qualify, VSAN requires 3 hosts MINIMUM. The vSAN supported product range for hardware is very narrow and is always high-priced enterprise class products. There are a lot more cheaper solutions that can do the same, even better. currently nutanix software is much more expensive than VSAN licensing. They've got a VSAN-like setup with their Unified Storage, and you can manage it all via Acropolis. No linking to product sales, affiliate links, self promotional links, or selling equipment. It's very easy to scale. Everything i was told is that they were storage first and a software storage solutions intended to run a hyper visor on it like hyper-v or vmware which is recommended, in fact most of the training was built around vmware. and the guys who manage it, take FOREVER to get stuff together for us, I have more hands on experience A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. 4K subscribers in the nutanix community. Since Nutanix charges more for RAM used and SSDs used? " Wanted to buy memory for some Dell XC servers with Nutanix Pro licenses. VSAN isn't trying to be the fastest though, it's about simplicity. VSAN is RAID 0 on host, RAID 5 over the network. 2K subscribers in the nutanix community. Nutanix does that for you, and you can add nodes of varying sizes and it orchestrates them all. So if you want vSwitch with vSphere you need the right license. We're a non-profit SMB with ~250 users spread across 10 sites (3 are ~50 users each) that primarily use Microsoft RDS for connectivity. If a node fails, vmware ha kicks in and restarts the vm's, just like vsan would so no difference there. ~4000 IOPS @ 0. AHV is a port of KVM and serves the same basic function VMware’s ESXi does. other platforms . Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying Take advantage of what Nutanix offers versus VMware, including the efficiency, simplicity, HDDs, and a choice of hardware or cloud. Zero data loss, and workloads still running. I saw 3 disks fail on a VXRail that dropped a 4 node cluster and support couldn't do a One of the options was VMware vSAN, which works pretty good from my experience. You could always look at the vSAN ReadyNodes parts list and look for SSDs used there and then cross reference, but Were currently jumping into Nutanix and just finished the training. 900 desktops wouldn't be To even things up, you’d have to license VSAN for 8 CPUs in this case, so add (list) $19,960 for that – so a new total of$66,871 for VSAN on Dell vs. In all both solutions are great I just like the idea of having Nutanix if I wanted to switch the environment from vCenter/ESXi to AHV, Hyper-V or Xen I have that option and they've validated the workloads. I would never never quote nutanix for 20 vms. comment sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment [deleted] • Just overall poor performance, especially compared to vsan. It's not to say that VMWare is not expensive but the solutions I would look at, Nutanix was usually more $$. Nutanix vs. Nutanix Objects is relatively cheap compared to both Nutanix AOS and other solutions listed in this thread. Nimble for VDI Project . My office simply went with vSAN because VMware gave us a bigger discount to stay with vSphere instead of ditching the software stack all together. We are now talking about ditching VMware and just running with pure Nutanix. Nutanix was literally twice the price of the alternative solutions for less CPU/RAM/storage(and hybrid at that, versus full flash), was missing features (we want to do everything with terraform, there's stuff you can't do via the API and there was no existing provider; we have an existing monitoring solution with all metrics stored in InfluxDB visualised with Grafana; we'd have to Nutanix ain’t half bad. Nutanix runs rings around vSAN. On the host level disks are presented directly to hosts as individual disks, and VSAN groups them together into pools of capacity called disk groups. Nutanix ADSF enjoys data locality by design, not by luck. But for a large organization that can't easily shift hypervisors, I don't understand how nutanix can be twice as expensive. Also, future licensing concerns with VMWare/Broadcom. Their arguments always amounted to “well in VMware I” even with features that had full parity. We had a great experience with Starwinds Appliances. Nutanix support is 100% top notch. From the article: During our good faith back and forth on testing, Nutanix suggested shipping us their own lower-spec VSAN platform and a Nutanix NX-3460-G4 (4x HDD and 2x SSD per node). a vSAN Topology. Also note in the article that vmware has a similar, if not identical eula about needing to approve the testing methods. More posts you may like. It's great! It works as advertised, great performance, easy to manage. I'm not saying VSAN has the features that Nutanix does though. I like that I don't have to be a storage engineer with it. My information is all outdated, but i did a direct comparison of Nutanix vs a regular 1-2-3 infrastrucutre using a leading array vendor a while back. So i'm looking for alts. Is the vSAN HCL really that much outdated ? Last time I was checking it (a while ago) it was fairly decently current. It looks very promising but extremely basic in terms of the UI, far from being mainstream yet. MS Exchange Performance - Nutanix vs VSAN 6. I'm not sure why you'd want to ditch vSAN for Nutanix at this point. IMHO, vSAN doesn't do a great job in rebuilding VMs as quickly enough as some of the other HCI's out here (Nutanix and Scale Computing). We currently have 10 hosts running vSAN. And you need 3 nodes minimum, you can't deploy vSAN with only 2 hosts. If I were building a data center today, I'd build it on Nutanix. VMWare vSAN can be changed with Starwinds vSAN in Windows Server for smaller environments which is simply cheaper, and makes more sense for smaller companies. Hi All I am currently looking at replacing our Nimble CS215 SAN, and im leaning towards a 3 node VSAN cluster. Erasure Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN. Nutanix in San Jose, California offers their software-defined Enterprise Cloud as a hyper-converged infrastructure solution. it was problematic for us. Haven't been very happy with VMware support in the last year or two. VSAN w/ Dell Hardware and ROBO licenses beat Nutanix Robo about ~10k per site. Nutanix- HPE has expanded their partnership with Nutanix to try to avoid dependence on VMware. It's a safe vSAN implementation that does the same HCI stuff Nutanix does. You might find this direct comparison between Nutanix and Simplivity on IT Central Station to be helpful: Users interested in these two solutions also read reviews for VMware VSAN. but it is still have issues, so we prefer to deploy VMware vSAN for most of our cutsomers. Similar to VMware VSAN, with Starwind VSAN you can have active-active HA storage for 2- or 3-node clusters. Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Nutanix and Citrix vs Dell EMC VxRail/vSAN and VMware Horizon. spdrweb8 I've worked on vSAN and Nutanix for over a decade, and while similar under the covers, I think nutanix is a better option overall. joshodgers All I can think of when I hear the name Nutanix is the battles you fought on Twitter and on discussion forums, the negativity, The history: Nutanix and VMware. Nutanix's biggest competiton from a revenue/install base perspective is VSAN actually. There is a supported 2x host configuration but it requires an extra cheap-o server to act as a SAN witness and it isn't recommended. 0) is new, and is based off of VSAN 6. Here's the main low down between the two. Starwinds VSAN is a great option for 2-3 node deployments. You didn't state how much storage you need, also did you consider vSAN? Is converged going to cause you any maintenance issues with having only the minimum number of hosts? Nutanix doesn't make much cost sense without also going with their hypervisor, have you looked at the difference vs VMware ? Do you leverage any VMware specific features? 4. Do I trust vSAN? Nah. I've not gotten hands on with AHV yet, but my understanding is it's probably at the same level as ESX 4 right now, still very much playing catch up. That's not the same as storage latency. Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying Hello friend. vSAN aside, VMware itself has not given me a lot of trouble, there's a reason they are the leaders in this space. Check out ESG report for comparison. For our Both VMware vSAN and Nutanix are SDS . I would look at two options: Nimble storage with 2-3 hosts, not the cheapest but this will be a great experience Nutanix support has always been grade A, as well. I often recommend S2D versus Nutanix, but OP clearly uses VMware and likes the idea of ditching, rather than swapping to Microsoft. Had to pay more than double in "Nutanix software licenses" than if I just bought the memory for a regular R730 server - even though the memory has the exact same part number I would consider Hyper-V if you want to go with the node + San setup or azure stack If you want hci. Performance - I will put HX up against Nutanix/vSAN etc any day of the week. Bonus is that Nutanix has VMware engineers on staff, so they can The storage efficiency and performance was honestly MUCH better at the time vs vSAN. As an example, this Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm writes, "We looked briefly at alternatives, but nothing stood out like vSAN. OpenStack vs. only to make things worse it was never intended for hci scenario and just like ceph needs 3+ nodes to start delivering aggregated perf It is important to note that in industries where flexibility and agility are paramount, such as media, retail or education, Nutanix is extensively used. When considering the effect a single disk failing has on a vSAN cluster vs a Nutanix cluster I would not trust critical workloads on vSAN. Can Hyper-V run on S2D clustered storage? Yes, but you have to create everything manually first. The difference if that VxRail includes an automation engine developed with Vmware wrapped around the node. We now are running 3 Nutanix clusters with more in the budget for this year. Whether you have 150 VDI desktops or 5000+ the performance remains the same no matter how much you scale (3 nodes to 30+ nodes and so on). additionally nutanix as a company is very efficient, If you're looking at trying to consolidate and reduce costs, HCI makes a ton of sense. We got a customer who's a bank with around 50 branches in the area. (Ok Nutanix has 3 licensing tiers but you still get most things in one package). I'm a past Nutanix customer and had nothing but good experiences with those appliances, but for whatever reason our higher ups dislike the name and brand because our past appliances were "slow" and "clunky" and didn't seem interested in hearing about how we were past due for refreshes as we were one of the early adopters of nutanix back in 2013 and were still running Vsan has some advantages for running in the hyper visor instead of running as a storage vm. I have experience with Cisco HX, vSAN ReadyNode on dell hardware, and Nutanix. The vSAN cluster is Cascade Lake, using Cisco UCS m5s. VSAN will lock you in to VMWare. Trusted by companies worldwide, Nutanix powers hybrid multicloud environments efficiently and cost effectively. VSAN spreads objects across disk groups on multiple hosts for availability and performance. We've got ESX running with Nutanix Acropolis, and it's awesome. The next logical step is to compare data reduction/efficiency technologies that apply further storage capacity efficiencies to the usable capacity. 5. But catch up it will. The plan would be to move to Nutanix AHV but I'm honestly not sold on Nutanix yet. I was scanned and now get tons of their marketing BS. Else, Vsan is a good and robust solution. And that leaves you a lot of growth room. The officially unofficial VMware community on Reddit. They have a Type-1 Hypervisor, AVH, seems to be based off of KVM/QEMU. I did setup Proxmox+Ceph on the NucNucNuc and really enjoyed it. Early vSAN was a fucking nightmare that I never wanted to re-live, and left a bad taste in my mouth. you can do direct connect fiber on the nodes and youre' done. We are considering moving to Nutanix from VMWare. It gave me some errors and went through several troubleshooting steps. 1 (not 6. Have the witness fail. Benchmarking storage using tools like fio or HCIbench can provide the difference between thin and thick-provisioned virtual disks on your servers. About 1/2 the deployments I see are VDI. We bought one Nutanix 3-node cluster last year and have been absolutely blown away. Nutanix isn't just a hypervisor. 134 IOPS a user (assumes 200 messages / day) is almost 30k users per Nutanix node. With ~$27k/y license cost (iirc). i thought that his articles are plain enough. S. Currently we run VMware on the Nutanix cluster. I manage both vsan and nutanix This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Nutanix also supports multiple Hypervisors, including VMWare. VMWare: DIY solution. HCIBench figures are a better representation of storage latency. No clue. As we speak I am converting over some of our Hyper-V servers. Am looking at Nutanix Prism + Acropolis +whatever their file server is called as potential alternative to vSphere + vSAN Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying operations and reducing complexity. Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN. The one advantage of Nutanix is it own hypervisor. Nutanix and VSAN are very similar storage technologies, but obviously different enough to separate themselves from competition. We really liked the Nutanix Prism Pro management system, Native in vSAN Multi-Hypervisor Management Love our Nutanix. Nutanix has a number of different products that fit into various different places of a virtualization environment. 6 powered cluster. My questions are, what's the benefit of the different types of Failover strategies (heartbeat vs node majority). The Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure solution combines the Nutanix went through the same thing, bunch of vmware bickering on their blog about testing methodology etc. vSAN was the first solution that came to mind. A companion sub to /r/sysadmin where redditors can share their blog articles, news links and As an alternative to VMware, I can suggest using Proxmox with ZFS replication or free Starwind VSAN as shared storage for the Proxmox cluster. I did a full 5 year TCO for both datacenters (ESX Ent+, Dell Servers, Netapp AFF SAN, Brocade FC versus Nutanix/SuperMicro w/ NCM Pro license) and the costs were similar. There is a reason why the other vendors do not allow performance numbers to be publicly released. The solution is straightforward and reliable, and the Starwind support team does a fantastic job at setting things up. We have two 3-node Nutanix clusters running AHV going on EOS within the year. I posted in a separate section of this thread with some comparisons from my PoV a Nutanix purchase means one number to call for support instead of cross-vendor finger pointing and slowdowns. Free is CLI only. Instant clones weren't a thing at the time as well. VXRail/VSAN just didn't seem ready yet at the time. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment. Then there also dHCI solutions, that are a little closer to a traditional SAN/server setup, but with a central management layer using the same network equipment for data as storage traffic. It was quite a bit cheaper from a licensing standpoint It is important to note that in industries where flexibility and agility are paramount, such as media, retail or education, Nutanix is extensively used. Tackle file services first. vsan needs a dedicated storage switch, starwind does not. I would agree about vendor lock. Nutanix was another solution, but surprisingly, it would have costed us more. As mentioned, Nutanix is KVM under the hood, so you can easily migrate to any KVM-based solution. Support has been generally good. I’m seeing a bit of vSAN max interest in the B series heavy shops. 5 Is shipping currently so with either VSAN solution the end result is going to be a VSAN 6. The official Python community for Reddit! Stay up to date with the latest news, packages, and meta information relating to Nutanix feeds vm's on a host with local io, and if its saturated, then it pulls from the network, reducing latency, and network traffic, and it does provide a bit of a performance bump when compared to an identical setup running vsan, however its not night and day. There aren't a lot of HCI players right now, so that's maybe another factor. They are more flexible and cheaper. Have had nothing but great experience with them, and their customer service is US based and pro-active. Welcome to the IPv6 community on Reddit. This also has implications on SSD Capacity, as Nutanix must generally stick with eMLC or Very High Endurance TLC to keep write endurance at levels that are acceptable. The load currently is mostly Citrix (about 140 servers using published desktop and published apps) with about 25 backend servers consisting of SQL and 20K subscribers in the SysAdminBlogs community. I'm moving us to ProxMox which is what I am doing now. We’re looking at replacing our nearly EOL nutanix hardware with VMware and we have about 20 VMs we’ll need to migrate. Hello all: Hey, you could even go just with vSAN and a traditional SAN pool architecture for the same price point I'm sure really. Conversions were often too time consuming and unreliable vs. Nutanix will fully utilize the bigger pipe you can provide to it Nutanix ADSF delivers a consistent write path regardless of where a VM resides or is moved to within a cluster. You might want to look into using Starwind VSAN functionality which supports both Hyper-V and ESXi. I know I shouldn't say it too loud or those prices will shoot up fast. For immediate help You might also find real user reviews for VMware vSAN and Nutanix on IT Central Station to be helpful. By the end of this year our entire environment will be hosted in Nutanix hardware. Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying We have a VMware vSAN setup, and we are looking to offer iSCSI storage to various operating systems and hypervisors, including Linux, Windows, VMware ESXi free, Hyper-V, Proxmox, Xenserver, and others. Between the two options, I would choose Nutanix. I really do hope they work on their pricing. Azure stack imo is a very nice setup and I think we gonna see a lot more of it the coming years as it blends in great with Azure itself. For prism vs vcentre , i find the prism okay , you can get a little lost in Nutanix in San Jose, California offers their software-defined Enterprise Cloud as a hyper-converged infrastructure solution. Teddy has a video about it here. e all VM's get same performance, regardless of location/node etc). Lenovo 4 920q i5-8500 64gb. As much as I love VSAN and Nutanix, the reality is that HCI solutions aren't that cost effective for smaller environments due to the license cost. Also, being able to go to one place and not letting them point the finger elsewhere ensures that we get good service. iii) Drawbacks to vSAN is how quickily you can rebuild datachunks. VMware hypervisor - awesome. With Nutanix, integrate seamlessly with existing VMware solutions under a unified single pane of glass while improving Is there any modern comparisons between how xenServer stacks up against VMware Vsphere/vCenter? Post-Broadcom buy out, VMWares pricing model has become distasteful to me after being a vmware drummer for over a decade. Lose an entire disk group. It's based on their VSAN technology, utilizes Dell servers, and provides decent support at both hardware and software levels. We also use Nutanix in prod too the deployment it's super easy and their support, lifecycle management, analytics and stability is way better than VMware's vSAN. its also another vendors application you need to learn how to navigate, to include Nutanix gives you a choice of using other hypervisors. VxRail (VSPEX BLUE 2. It would have been more engineering effort, but I think they should have attempted to use VxFlex/ScaleIO as the storage platform and which would have made more sense. Sorry for the delay. The customer is a UCS shop (connected to IBM storage) today w about 700 VMs (these are out of scope of this project). If you want vSan then you buy another license. View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. VMware and Nutanix both offer very similar things. It then looks like Nutanix were the ones who wanted to include an underpowered VSAN system in the mix which sounds somewhat shady to me. Trying to decide between Nutanix, Hyper-V/S2D and VMware vSphere/vSAN . I had to check the numbers multiple times. Nutanix nodes can be configured with less storage hardware If your team doesn’t mind learning how to manage nutanix it’s fine, but vsan is much easier since its all managed through vcenter. The software, and if you buy it from them the hardware, are nicely woven together. Hi, hoping this reddit can help. I actually built a three node NUC cluster, with the intention of testing out Nutanix, which I called the NucNucNuc (for the stooges) Unfortunately, it didn't go well. I equate them to Windows There’s a non-trivial amount of VMware vSAN on Cisco clusters out there, and Cisco integrated full lifecycle finally into vLCM (the number 1 reason I’d seen vSAN + UCS shops move to another server platform). vSAN doesn't perform particularly well (thats being polite) and its not particularly trouble free based on all my experience with it. 0 being unsupported in the loopback for Hyper-V and were proudly pitching it was Nutanix who they think had invented hyper converged thing. I personally wouldn't trade VMware for Nutanix unless you really want a Nutanix exclusive feature. 7K subscribers in the nutanix community. imho only other product that can compete in the space is VMware VSAN. This Reddit is aimed at the education and support for the community. I sell all the brands you mentioned and if price is a big concern but you need a robust but simple solution scale is honestly amazing. Simplicity is the most expensive (50k difference between hypercovered high end and low end, so at the level we are talking no real difference. I hope it gets there though, would be nice to have another open source option alternative to something like VMware ESXi + VSAN or Nutanix. Since the application process itself is often nothing short of herculean and time-consuming to boot, this place is meant to serve as a talking ground to answer questions, better improve applications, and increase one's chance of being 'Referred'. The Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure solution combines the Nutanix Acropolis virtualization solution, Nutanix AHV hypervisor (though Acropolis works with other hypervisors), Prism cluster manager, Nutanix Calm and Nutanix Flow server management, Nutanix vs. or a 2/3-node VSAN cluster could suit 5. 4. The tool to do that could be better but so far it is working with one busted up Hyper-v that wouldn't cooperate. There is no reason you can't use vsan, it works well and if you can design it properly, it works great, if you don't, it runs like crap. Nutanix's warranty/Equipment is almost EOL and the VSAN isn't setup right and doesn't do mixed mode or dedicated storage. There is a ton of stuff to Google and read on vmware if you neeed help whereas Nutanix usuallythere is nothing and you need to make a phone call to support. I haven’t used them but I suspect their cloud and data protection items are a bit easier to work with. " Or just grab some pizza boxes and make a cluster. " In the first post in this series, I compared the actual Usable Capacity between Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN on the same hardware. Nutanix isbslighty easier to use for day to day use but certain things vmware is easier. VSAN 2 node has some improvements now with U2/U3 you can: Lose a host. VSAN is very simple to manage when it comes to updates. migrating data to new VM instances. Other considerations would be cost (HP StoreVirtual due to choice of compute layer) and support (couldn't say personally though I know HP networking product support is Nutanix you pay one (licensing)price and get it all. Unless they are giant vms 5. If I had my way, and $$$, I would have Nutanix at all sites, setup DR replication (latency permitting) etc. The only HCI I've personally had positive experiences with, mostly because I wasn't footing the bill, was Nutanix, and even that was going downhill last I Nutanix has a range of hardware you can use, their own version of KVM with added features (you can scrap VMware licensing) or even go with Hyper-V, SimpliVity benefits from ASIC offloading gets better dedupe/compression ratios cannot do KVM or Hyper-V must be dual CPU and All Flash, vxRail is just DELL/EMC packaged VSAN with a little special sauce since they are so With a ~$3k/y license cost. We are trying to finalize our ELA and from what I'm seeing nutanix is over 2x the price per core than broadcom. In a recent post, I compared the actual Usable Capacity between Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN on the same hardware and we saw approx 30-40% more usable capacity delivered by Nutanix. 2), with a bunch of products stitched together to make it work. I’m running both vsan on VMware readynodes and a few small nutanix clusters running VMware. Nutanix sounds ideal for what you are describing VDI Use Case PDF link. If active-passive storage works for you, ZFS HA replication does the job just fine. Right now, they're satisfied. I trust my NAS. Nutanix has some advantages in their products as they developed them more recently. Nutanix is basically expensive replication software, sitting on top of your hardware choice (we went with Supermicro, from Nutanix). Storage, compute, networking, and virtualization, together in one platform defined by cloud-scale Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home I’ve been using vsan in a shared network environment and I’ve had more trouble with iSCSI San than vsan. Nutanix: Turn key solution. It also included Pure, and while I’m sure it’s awesome stuff, they wanted $75k more for 25TB effective less storage. It got a lot of hate from the guys that were mediocre at VMware, mostly due to change. I'm in the progress of rebuilding my entire virtualization infrastructure and while doing so I'm setting up HA/Failover clustering with a 2-node cluster, where I've decided Starwinds vSAN is what I need. Flash SAN vs vSAN? Or both Even more important, on a Tintri all-flash SAN, or on Nutanix/VSAN, you get performance visibility, QOS, snapshots, cloning and replication all at the VM level. If you use the GUI you get a trail license which does not revert to free after 30 days. r/vmware. vSan vs Nutanix: Direct Comparison. arrays by the DOZEN with these Nutanix appliances. While I know VSAN isn't considered HyperConverged it's the baseline architecture towards that type of deployment. (In contrast, VMware has two different and separate vSAN architectures – ESA vs. VMware vs nutanix pricing comments. Licensing of vSAN has a trend to be more economical compared to Nutanix. Next, When I powered them back on the vsan wouldn't respond. To be honest at the performance levels achieved the constraint is usable capacity not IOPS, so more performance would be somewhat redundant for Exchange. vCenter is View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Still Nutanix sales had no clue about SMB 3. The items of most importance are: vSAN cache and capacity disks, vSAN disk controller, the NICs, then the boot disk and it's disk controller, of course the CPU type and an appropriate amount of RAM - these things and their firmware versions are checked by the Gonna redo my vSan lab to Nutanix AHV so i thought i post a picture before i kill it . View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Nutanix can run just about any workload, gives you the option of using the AHV hypervisor to lower costs, and is by far the easiest to manage a large scale. I moved jobs and the new place had moved from VMware to Nutanix, also with some VMware on Nutanix. That being said new company also has Nutanix. 5K subscribers in the nutanix community. Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying At this time, only vSAN ReadyNodes are supported for ESA. They support three: vSphere, Hyper-V, and KVM. I haven't gone back and revisited it yet. The un-official Dell EMC VxRail SubReddit. It has some pros comparing to vSAN of course, but still too expensive. We have higher IOPS, more consistent performance (i. For example converting a hyper v machine to vmware was easier than Nutanix. We saw approximately 30-40% more usable capacity delivered by Nutanix. No it's not cheap, but it has been very solid for us. You won’t see individual SSD manufacturers tested for compatibility. Also Nutanix treats your hardware nodes as appliances, so it's difficult to upgrade ram or storage or A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. we moved away from Nutanix, we had a few environments of it. 1. Nutanix isn't a plain hypervisor like Hyper-V or ESX, its an HCI orchestrator. And as with EMC, Nutanix works with Hyper-V , KVM not just VMware and Nutanix loves that VSAN has come into the market and validated the NoSAN approach. Keep in mind, this is application latency as reported through Benchmark Factory. The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, No, VSAN is a cluster level construct that works across a cluster to protect data. On our site, compare SQL numbers against each other if you want to check it out that way. I think Nutanix has great tech. Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying operations and reducing complexity. Yes you would get more functions and features from Nutanix but you also get more cost. Actually we were considering this change from vSAN to Nutanix as well. I love VMware since I've become experienced with it. Users interested in Nutanix also read reviews for VMware vSAN. Maybe I'll talk a look at VSAN but for me the feature parity wasn't there and it was just too new. On the simple side. VxRail 4. Said that feature integration with Nutanix has always But it seems that nutanix data locality helps a lot and it seems like VMware has solved a lot of vsan issues in the ESA . So far HP VSA is more alike VMware VSAN and requires 3-node to setup, I would suggest you to go with StarWind VSAN. I've finally threw in the towel and said screw it. Honestly I’m surprised VMW has stuck by their VSAN pricing as long as they have. ESA technically requires 25Gb networking between nodes. Probably because I've mostly worked with Cisco on prem hardware in school and at work compared to any other solutions especially a cloud solution but it might also be one of those things that once I get familiar with it and learn the ins and outs about it I will start to love it I have evaluated just about every converged/hyperconverged solution on the market (Nutanix, Simplivity, vSAN, HP HC380, etc) and in my opinion it's really a 2 horse race - Nutanix and vSAN. If you're thinking about moving from vmware hypervisor, give Nutanix a try. 6K subscribers in the nutanix community. I looked at Nutanix but it's wasteful for what we do so that's out. This subreddit is for all those interested in working for the United States federal government. Read the rules before posting! This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, Thanks for the insight. The latest version of Nutanix doesn't like the gen7 NUCs at all. HyperV is my last resort option. $214,855 for the Dell/Nutanix. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. It doesn’t have triple parity like nimble has, but with nutanix or vsan to get FTT2 you need like 5 nodes anyways to get part way there. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I was looking at VSAN and kept coming across articles published by VMWare saying that their solution is $140k cheaper than Nutanix. I tried migrating to oVirt and Proxmox. HCI: Lefthand (if you can still get it) Simplivity -decent features, but if you don't fit its specific use cases it can be difficult to justify the costs and limitations vs VSAN. This is made up of 3 main components: Server hardware with hard disks and/or ssd A hypervisor (esxi, hyper-v, or Nutanix’s AHV). The other 1/2 are general server BCA (SQL/Exchange/Line of Buisness apps). HP StoreVirtual is compatible with Hyper-V, VMWare, Xen and I believe even KVM now. VxRail We're trying to compare HCI quotes between Nutanix and VxRail. When I submit Nutanix tickets I get a much more experienced technician right off the bat where VMware seems to assign a much lower level initial tech to do initial evaluations, probably because their huge install base demands a less skilled front line to help filter the load. One of the really nice features with the SAN is the ability to schedule snapshots and have them stored in the SAN as diaster recovery solution incase of a ransomware attack, does vSAN have a similiar ability? and some way to protect the snapshots from encryption? ( forget about ex-scaleio thing , dell practically killed it when started bundling with their own hardware , this isn’t how sds is done . It is competitive at all IMO compared to any of the SAN vendors we reviewed before purchasing the NetApp which included Nimble and Nutanix. I understand that vSAN has an iSCSI Target service that can be used for this purpose. The reason why VDI is because the product works well for it (Data reduction doesn't do anything for linked clones), and VDI tends to be green field deployments (or breaking existing storage), while traditional workloads are on a 4-7 year vSAN v Nutanix analysis. Taking into account 3-2-1 rule in terms how data should be stored, please take to consideration VSAN+DRS. This enables companies to focus on successful business outcomes and new innovations. Reply reply All your VM's run on ESXi. ) Nutanix the lack of hardware card accelerator worries me that it relays on software and may not preform as well but a good point earlier about how yo then have a single point of a failure. There's too much going on. I had the same experience with a recent install. OSA). It shouldn't be hard to use CLI only - there are shell scripts for everything but be careful that you understand what you are doing from the outset - things will go south rather quickly if you just read the documentation as you go along. The primary considerations in the comparison VMware vSAN vs Nutanix are the specifics and requirements of your industry and organization. I just can't get to 100% health. " Why not throw Dell, HP and EMC EVO:RAIL appliances in the mix? A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. 0. Size accordingly. We started migrating around 2016 after the vSAN fiasco and AHV being free at the time was a big sell. Usable Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN. vSAN Meh. I work for a VAR and a client is evaluating Cisco HyperFlex vs Nutanix for a 100-250 seat Citrix VDI implementation. The performance penalty arises during active writing to new storage blocks and halts when a thin disk grows thick, or when write operations to new blocks are replaced by reads. joshodgers. Nutanix is a software company that sells hyper-converged infrastructure software. Reply When you compare vSAN vs Nutanix pools & containers it's not really a direct comparison. vSAN- this is the standard for VMware shops. Nutanix scales much higher than VSAN in terms of node count. Nutanix is just to manage and distribute the storage. Been a VMware guy since 3. . Much of reddit is currently restricted or otherwise unavailable as part of a large-scale protest to changes being made by reddit regarding API access. They were choosing between VXRail, Nutanix, and Starwind HCA. Improvements in witness failure handling, the ability to do mirroring inside a host between disk group etc. The primary considerations in the Another CON is cost. Ultimately, we are considering Nutanix over vSAN due to licensing costs. r/AZURE • Usable capacity for Nutanix and vSAN is similar in that both keep two or three copies of data (resulting in usable of 50% or 33%0 BUT the big difference is Nutanix stores and distributes data in 1MB chunks which means storage is very efficiently used, whereas more free space can (and usually is) required with vSAN since it stores larger objects (up to 255GB) which can fragment Some software like Nutanix or vSAN are intended to be more hardware agnostic, other solutions have much stricter hardware requirements. Nutanix was another solution, but surprisingly, it would have cost us more. I'd never put a domain controller, Web server or anything I can't afford to lose on vSAN. Can you PoC both options? A vSAN cluster bought for PoC can be easily repurposed and no dollars lost, haven't heard of Nutanix RMAs for "didn't like it. Dell EMC VxRail Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Appliances (G Series, E Series, V Series, P Series, S Series), software running on them (VxRail Manager, VMware Virtual SAN Enterprise, VMware vCenter Server, VMware vRealize Log Insight, VMware vSphere Data Protection, VMware vSphere Replication, Dell EMC Customer don't have to buy Nutanix HW, Nutanix already has many Dell OEM options and more OEM partners to follow. Nutanix ADSFs worst case scenario of two write replicas being sent remotely (during maintenance or CVM failure) is a typical scenario fo vSAN. if vsan, add $10K for a switch they'll rec'd on their HCL (broadcomm, cisco, hpe, etc). I talked to ex-marine guy and young Indian with brackets and horrible accent. Nutanix and VMware are two of the most recognized names in hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) and virtualization. When we looked Nutanix was the strongest by far in that space for enteprise. I don't love vsan, we use it, but id rather just have some 3rd party array. In general, you'll find quite a bit of content with a search on reddit, as there's been quite a few threads about Nutanix. 5 and certified VCP for 5 and 6. Will probably end up coding out the infrastructure deployment for Azure and Hyper-V, maybe Nutanix. We're actively migrating from a converged VMware cluster to a S2D Hyper-V hci cluster to minimise our licensing costs for our existing on-prem infrastructure while we're in a growth phase. Migrated our 65 or so VMs from a Nutanix cluster and haven’t looked back. There’s no storage VM to maintain. If you go to Nutanix you are looking at $90k - $120k. The management to it must be impossible, I helped set up the VMs for the management, and we had to set up virtual clusters within clusters, because they refused to be installed on anything but empty servers. Nutanix uses an iSCSI container and advertises the storage as NFS4 (NFS3 if you choose that) so ALL nodes use the storage from all nodes. OP could look at vSAN ready nodes as well, or instead. oqti cslg uejn zgm jwvnra oxlw vazxwrxg yywzi kmvz kijq