X265 vs normal reddit. ahh ic, remux is where its at.

X265 vs normal reddit 4K, HDR10+ and Dolby Vision - Probably the best 4K version out right now if you have a device that can support Dolby Vision and HDR. With x265, i use main10, 10bit, veryslow with crf 20, i also set deblock to -1,-1 to get a kind of "film" tune due to x265 not having that tune specifically. My entire collection is x265 (except the few rare cases only x264 exists). Now create a new required tag for x265 and add all the "265" varients like x265, h265, x. I've been testing x265 settings and found a sweet spot for best quality/file size for phone. There's a definite pattern with Quality, with X265 usually being lower CRF to CRF. that given the same quality. Really wish they hadn't screwed over the 3rd party apps that not only just worked, but had waaayyy more features. It is possible to configure x264 and x265 to produce output that, for a given bitrate and other basic settings, is better than the mainconcept encoder. t0paz, pof, pahe, ivy megusta. 265 and h. i would download the x264 because x265 10-bit veryslow vs slower vs slow I made the mistake of encoding my whole library with x264 10-bit, so now I need to re-encode all of it. In simplified terms, this means that the panel’s controller quickly alternates between the nearest colors in a dynamic pattern. Go for what you prefer between x264 or x265. The whole point of h265 is to get better quality for the same bitrate (and thus file size) or similar quality at a lower bitrate (smaller file size). The exact quality difference can vary depending on the content and encoding settings, but AV1 is typically able to deliver 20-30% better compression efficiency compared to x265. Looking at a couple of examples my 720p x264 frame rates are 23. There are tons of data on reddit, even EposVox done tests on both encoders. aac is smaller. Is there any good with using AAC over AC3 or normal DTS? I have an old 5. -x264 was around 18-20 -x265 was like 20-22 for near perfect quality. I’m strictly speaking of sdr btw. I know this was pretty strait forward with x264 but I've read many times that x265 presets (fast, med, slow, etc. Normal consumer hardware such as your Android TV device (except the Nvidia Shield) don't support native 10bit H264, only 10 bit HEVC. 89gb, 2229 kbps) The file size is proportional to the bitrate irrespective of encoding. . flac, vorbis, ac3, dd5. if you watch it on one monitor and game on the other, you might have to turn your game graphics down to compensate If you're using an old video player or editor, it might not support x265, just because it's fairly new I honestly can't stand the normal Reddit app. using handbrake (older batch seems faster on these chips), normal preset but QSV and RF20 the movies it outputs are of good quality and if size does not matter encode them at RF15 With QSV a 2h movie takes about 35min to encode (quality preset, balanced or fast tends to cause artifacts forgot which of the two). Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS 2160 x265 vs 1080p x264 on 1080p TV . I wanted to try the x265 for a change and used similar settings as I would with x264 properties=x265-faster f=mp4 vcodec=libx265 acodec=aac crf=19 ab=256k I usually make sure Encoder speed reach the highest and maximum threads to make it faster. X265 default is 28, and they recommend +/- 2 given personal taste. As a comparison, x264 was started around 2005, and it has almost finished development around 2013. This advantage is especially noticeable at higher resolutions and bitrates. ) are more quality focused and the slower will increase quality and file size. 264 (x264). 44gb with 28. Similarly, if you set all 3 to encode with a target file size of 5 GB, the x265 one is going to be the best quality of the 3. This is especially true with larger frames (i. Mar 3, 2021 · x265 is going to be better as long as you have hw decoding on your playback devices, which most new devices do support. = ) (It's higher by about 2 points on average. 86Mb/s (183%). No context, AV1 is still years away of replacing x265 for those uses. x265 is going to be better as long as you have hw decoding on your playback devices, which most new devices do support. 265 and H. Even with an i9 10980XE, encoding a 2 hour 4K video takes a day at a time on CPU at the slow preset. For example, my rip of Reservoir Dogs is 1. 1 setup, btw. For example, to get a same PSNR (~40. If you're worried about performance, x265 requires a beefier machine. vs. the time vs benefit of using slower (which is actually the veryslow setting from x265 2. Jul 30, 2022 · x264 and x265 are open source encoder implementations of the H. My laptop spec is even below yours: AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon Graphics 2. You should keep it in constant rate factor mode (CRF) and set a rate factor that you think achieves acceptable visual quality to you. 265 format, but they utilize a fixed set of features of h. Typically you'll want to match quality or file size to get a reasonable point of comparison. Depends on the size of your tv and how far you sit from it. 25GB x265 1080p 2. 4ghz? i personally switched from slower to slow on my encodes. codecs: h264 is normal, 265/HEVC is like 20% smaller and av1 is 20% smallerer. However, recently it has come to my attention that not all x265 encodes are created equal. If disk space isn't an issue, then an archival copy would be a bit-for-bit exact clone of the original disc. 1, opus are bigger. Godzilla. 264, VP9, AV1. No one can tell you how different it is without downloading and comparing the files, its a case by case basis. 265 determined by whatever the hardware is able to support. 1-Pass 8bit vs 2-Pass 8bit vs 1-Pass 10bit vs 2-Pass 8bit As expected, 10bit > 8bit. If the media isn't source quality/remux, then there will be a loss of quality every time. x265-RARBG (1. x265. 265 (x265) is newer and will give you better quality at the same size (bitrate) as H. I personally prefer x265 since it gives me around 33% smaller file size with the same RF quality when compared to x264, even though it does take around 50% longer to encode during my anime encoding testing. and quite honestly, unless i'm comparing screen captures of various b frames, i can't tell much of a difference when playing either encode on my TV Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. x265 is designed to provide better compression efficiency compared to x264. The same subjective quality requires less data (50%?). 49GB x265 Blu-ray 1080p 3. x265 (release titles), with negated required exclusions of ALL x265 groups, listed out 1 by 1. BluRay. Preset stuff when it comes to quality and file size with HEVC/x265. 9 and for 1080p x265 29. In the near future we will have AV2 and VP10 too, I don't want h266/VVC to gain adoption as its royalty based. Well, I use 10-bit for x265 and now for SVT-AV1, too. Essentially it's just a 712 page PDF you can download that describes how the video should be encoded and decoded. I have a 4k OLED and I spent a lot of time trying to see if I could tell a difference between a high-quality x265 encode and the Remux. 264 are encoding standards. 2020, which limits luma to 64-940 and chroma to 64-960 (exactly 4 times the limits for 8-bit video in Rec. They run on the CPU. I checked old messages, some people claim its due to hw support but even my old crappy tablet supports x265. x265 at 7yo is by no mean untested. Encoding Time SVT-AV1 in Seconds If AV1 requires more source-specific tuning (ie, newer film vs grainy older film vs B&W vs cartoon vs action with lots of motion vs non-action film without a great deal of high-motion) then I'm not sure that re-encoding my library will be worth it. 1080p. x265/h265 (also called HEVC) is a newer video codec used in UHD 4K Blu-Rays and the vast majority of UHD 4K online streaming/video downloads. It achieves higher compression ratios by utilizing more advanced coding techniques, such as improved motion compensation, larger block sizes, and enhanced entropy coding. H. But really HEVC has been out for years and is the transition technology on the road to the new AVC-1 / AV-1 codec. Currently, I'm using pretty old hardware that's way overdue for an upgrade (slightly-sub-1080p laptop screen). 265 codecs. 5) between x265 and NvEnc, you need to go from 4. The extra ~25GB of storage space required for a remux isn’t worth it for me. EDIT: Thanks for the pointers. h. This is correct. Aug 14, 2024 · Posted in r/Piracy by u/Mark_Knight • 679 points and 128 comments Sep 27, 2024 · For VMAF comparisons, the best x265 tune is probably PSNR (disables adaptive quant, psy-rd, and cutree) since there's no tune VMAF. Now I am trying x265 and experimenting with crf 20 - 24 and preset fast to veryfast. audio tracks: multiple audio tracks will obviously add up. What a joke. And the point of x265 was that you get the same quality at around half the bitrate compared to x264, so there's a lot of bandwidth and disk space savings. 264 instead of H. This is just an example, but my question is mostly this: Often times I get two torrent options, X264 or X265, X265 being much lower in size, but is… I've been doing a lot of experimentation with h. I have a Ryzen 5900x and I still get roughly 2fps on the x265 10-bit veryslow preset and 3. By looking at the last two Graphs it seems that a Quality Value of ~30-35 should be considered for 1080p Film content. This is definitely a bit weird. It can't be changed to something else without a huge loss of quality. 265 is a standard. e. 8 (it's technically still 30, haha) for all Hollywood made movies. I'm curious to know where did you get the information that it use 500% more power to encode for 5% quality increase?? With the limited bitrate cap of 6000kbps, x264 will still provide way better quality than Nvenc on twitch stream. The file sizes and encoding times of the encoded videos were: using H. HEVC-PSA (done as release title, not release group as I think PSA has some lower quality releases also) elite 1080p. 265 encoding. The short answer is the H. Reddit's home for let's players, streamers, and any other kind of gaming content creator! Exchange tips and tricks! Hone your craft! Make the best content you can make! Creators big and small are all welcome. 10-20% smaller files dont come close to making up for the significantly higher encoding time and much less supported playback. But a ~2gb x265 Joybell release is gonna look way worse than an ~8gb x264 FGT copy. it's a really subtle but important difference. If you're asking whether b-frames will help with color banding, it depends upon the complexity of the scene--but any help they'd offer would be minimal. I just went by the x265 documentation/Handbrake recommendations. So let's say you take a raw BluRay file and encode it 3 times at consistent quality in x265, x264, and MPEG-4. Now there are some shitty x265 encodes out there. NVenc is a hardware encoder (uses dedicated encoding hardware on GPU), and is designed mostly for screen recording/streaming, and so speed is its main objective. I have a question regarding desired bitrate when it comes to animated content. And if your source is 8 bit, re-encoding it to 10 bit won't do anything x265 is good for for 4k stuff or 1080p if they used the the remuxes as source. Just curious what people think about Blu-ray content compressed by x264 vs the same content compressed by NVENC H265 on an Ampere or Turing card like the RTX 20/30 for example. 5mbits iirc across all of my content. 84gb with 27. 265 (x265) RF:21 >> Result file size 150MB H. 264\5 out of resolve also has a history of instability with some users. 6. The x265/H265 software encoders automatically incorporate b-frames into their presets, or you can tweak them using advanced options. The audio tracks are concerning main audio tracks. Is there a difference in the file output between QSV and non QSV encoded QuickSync and other hw based encoders are still h. If you are storage poor and just need to save space, use x265. Disclaimer: I'm a maintainer of a x264 modded version, and a x265 modded version, and a contributor of x265 project. Note: it has been found that 10-bit x265 can have better quality than 8-bit x265 even if the source is 8-bit and the playback device is 8-bit without dithering, but the benefit is marginal and it's not about banding improvement but inherent efficiency gains from the precision boost. my pc wasnt a potato but isn't the top end either, and i use vlc or iina, so noy sure whats the prob, but leaning towards the potatoness of my pc. 265 12-bit (x265) Are these HDR profiles or no? Reply reply But if you are creating both x265 and x264 from a raw source file, then there is no reason the x265 would have poorer quality. 2021. 3mb/s bitrate) vs x264 (30. And as it's movies for my phone, then i rather have a good quality. Kong. Half the size will be the same quality, and a 1GB x265 movie will look like just as much garbage as a 2GB x264 Yify. I'd rather just buy another HDD. Fuck u/spez. 6/2. Edit, I'm also interested in the relative efficiency of H. containers: mkv is usually smaller than mp4. I've read a few posts and it seems to be a difference in overall quality and bit/frame rate as to why to stick with x264 instead of x265. Mostly sticking with x264 for compatibility with older devices. In Handbrake I like CRF 18 I use Tone mapping to get rid of HDR for devices that don't support HDR I set the present to normal or slow (reduces file size) I also get rid of Atmos tracks or HD MA (regular 5. But then require x265 with 4k content Why would that be? Does x265 mean more loss of quality with lower resolutions ? Why should you not do x265 with say 1080p content ? My understanding was that x265 was just better overall to preserve more quality with less size, and that the only reason to use x264 was for device compatibility. 8bit Film Sample. Even in 2024, almost every release group prefers x264. You can also use svt with preset 4 or 5 and be much more efficient than x265. x265 17RF is the same as AV1 25RF for constant quality, assuming all other settings the same, and speed set to medium (x265) and 5 (AV1) No and it's not even close. 265 (x265)", and all other settings remained the same. Devices that don't support HDR likely don't support this particular variant of x265 even if they claim x265 support. You could choose to have files with identical size and the x265 would have better quality, or files with identical quality and the x265 would be smaller, or any other variation you like. 265. RARBG was slightly better than YIFY despite being smaller, because x265 will give same quality as a x264 encode with 40% higher bitrate. so it takes shortcuts and requires a higher bitrate to store the same quality image as x265. 79 GB (4 998 kb/s, x265 10 bit). 9 . g. What I was trying to get at is that x264 and x265 are pretty close and even the same quality when dealing with higher bitrate encodes while taking far less time to do the actual encode. 3. It would make sense to me that 264 is geared towards broadcast and the encoder is much faster but less efficient in terms of fidelity vs. 265 compression if my NAS' processor is only a 6 year N3060 dual celeron 1. Mediainfo output (x265): I can reduce the storage space taken by half per series by going for x265. 84 GB (2 330 kb/s, x264 8 bit) vs 3. It will almost certainly take longer than the GPU mainconcept encoder but the quality of that encoder isn't very good. People will get random specs, blocks or other craziness in the final render that aren't in the preview. EDIT: Of course THIS comment actually goes through and posts right away. The one caveat is HDR which is x265 Main 10. It offers the potential for smaller file sizes without sacrificing quality so much, so it's much more efficient in terms of hard drive space, especially with UHD 4K video. Also, once you go x265, typically that file is done. The ~8gb x264 and the ~5gb x265 will look pretty close. A ~5gb x265 encode from Silence or Afm72 or somebody is going to look way better than a ~2gb x264 RARBG or YTS encode. X265 is a software encoder which uses your main processor. It's not quite as clear cut as x265 being software. This would look pretty awful under normal circumstances, so these displays use a little trick called “dithering” to simulate a bit depth of 8 bits per channel. Each is more efficient than the last. I would say in general I'd trust scene/p2p to make higher quality encoding choices than a streaming service. AV1 is good for for streaming, and maybe sharing low bitrate video over the internet where quality is not the main concern, around CRF 28~32+ for x265, AV1 was overall better than x265, albeit, SEVERELY slower. 84 to 8. X265 CPU - Whats the current state of play? Hi all, whats the current general opinion/state of play when it comes to H265 encoding, especially for 4K video. A streaming service is trying to optimize bandwidth usage and overall customer satisfaction w/ quality. 264 is by far the most common codec in use, and thus it is the most widely supported across different plex client It's not quite as clear cut as x265 being software. It might take longer to process than the mainconcept encoder running on CPU. I tested with a number of movies, old and new, the results are the same. I'm not sure what that means quite yet but as I'm scouring for playback issues realize that's the difference between the movies that play smoothly and the newer content I've downloaded that Recently got a NAS, going slighly crazy storing every movie/TV show I can think of. While the lossless remux releases are ideal if you’re a quality purist, the differences between that and a 20Mbps bitrate x265 encode are imperceptible in motion. You will get about 10-15% smaller files for the same if not better quality. I realized it was because there was no hardware decoding for x265, so I had to reencode the files to x264 and it worked wonderfully. 265 (HEVC) is an amazing codec. true. It will give you a better result than the hardware encoder, which means for the same video quality, the file size will be much smaller. You set x265 to a very high quality metric at the expense of a ton of storage. I am wondering how everyone likes to store their audio and what format they are using here in 2020. Need some help with audio formats, Most x265 encodes have AAC audio. HEVC (x265) is better in all regards except as people have said it requires modern hardware. If you want maximum compatibility and the option to change your files to something else later, then x264. And if the x265 was made from the x264, then the x264 will be even better. 10-bit encoding usually means Rec. Better Call Saul 1080p S05 x265 from RARBG is 8gb in size and all the subtitles are in a separate folder Better Call Saul 1080p S05 x264 from ITSALLGOODMAN is 55gb but the foreign subtitles are baked in Then there is a Better Call Saul S05 BDRip x265 from ION265 is 3. Just disable them. That's only the current hardware encoded AV1 that is just behind software encoded x265 with archival settings (but much faster to encode and no Ip issues). Bitrate than 265, but I'm curious if that's the case. efficiency. 1mb/s bitrate). The x265 is going to be the smallest file; it's the most efficient trade off between size and quality. Both GalaxyRG and Asiimov are fairly low bitrate and are probably not great rips. Switching to H265 NVEnc is twice faster, and the file size is about 1/3 smaller. 265 is not and probably never will be supported for web streaming in firefox, chrome, or edge due to its patent situation. It doesn't need to be 10+GB, but 3-4GB will almost always be great. The quality of x264 is about the same as x265 at half the bitrate. That said, you may not notice any difference at all. So 10GB x264 will have better image quality than 3GB x265. Reencoding a BDrip is not ideal for encoding there is a difference. Well, honestly, I don't think I've ever noticed any quality loss with H264 at all. There are better release groups out there by a long shot. For full length movies, I've settled on getting 4K remuxes, with a single generally being around 55-80 GBs, depending on availability, length, and source. Then I realized almost noone uses x265 for 1080p or 720p. It's not quite as clear cut as x265 being software. 265 10-bit (x265) and H. I still prefer a ~5gb QxR encode when available but when its not ive been happily replacing 2gb x264 rarbg copies with 1. 265 can be hard on old HW to decode on the fly so run some test footage through your main device first. You need a lot(!) more patience/processing when you encode/compress the video (5-20x?) and slightly(2x?) more processing power when watching it. I'll chime in with a dissenting experience I mentioned a few months ago--if you are encoding well lit video with a lot of detail (faces), high quality (crf=22 or better on x265 slow) and slow movements, AOM cannot compete with x265 unless you use a very low speed, I think 2 or 3. heys, thanks for the reply. 264 vs. For streaming or youtube videos,. So definitely use that if you aren't already. X265 vs x264 compression time requirement Totally noob question of course, but I want to make I'm not being a total nitwit using wrong settings etc Normally I use x264 codecs for compression. For my next round il do preset 3 with more samples (~12) and compare: X265 CRF 24 vs AV1 CRF 25 x265 10 bits is the best actually (2022)! Vastly superior to x264 and x265 8 bits, way more compatible than in the past (Youtube, Facebook, everybody accept those nowadays, most new players too) and the extra color space gives you so much power on night and low light level scenes (where you need thousands variations of dark colors). 265 video. Everyone keeps saying "significantly" but when I encode with x264 and x265 i can only get about a 10-20% reduction using x265 over x264 before the x265 quality drops below the x264. Where x265 really shines is with low bitrates. 265 (AMD VCE) RF:21 >> Result file size 430MB My question is, for visible no loss in the quality why the file sizes so drastically different? Am I missing something here? AMD VCE will speed up my work hugely but the problem is the file size. Jul 19, 2023 · x264 vs x265: Compression Efficiency. Encoding Speed: Historically, x265 has had an advantage in encoding speed compared to AV1. On a pixel level, yes there is loss in detail. 709). The Plex Media Server is smart software that makes… The question is on both the side of movies and tv shows The first, movies: I have a library that contains more than 400 movies in x264 usually downloaded from rarbg from encoders like SPARKS, REFiNED, FGT but i was considering the switch to x265 then found the releases of QXR so i download Avengers Infinity War and compared it to mine below are the mediainfo of both Well fast forward to the more recent future and I finally realize that 4K content is encoded a little different, it's still in MP4 containers but uses x265. I was impressed at how GOOD x265 is when it comes to compression: a x264 file was twice the size for a x265 of the same quality. For questions and comments about the Plex Media Server. 2Channel So far I've been using RARBG and have been happy with their x264 and x265 1080p uploads. In this case the x265 means the person reencoded the remux, lowering the quality, in order to make it h265 and lower the size. and also if h265 is basically HEVC_NVENC for NVIDIA GPU acceleration. H265 NVENC vs. So i went with X265 on all the movies. I DL'ed some TV shows for him that were encoded x265, and couldn't be played at all. I then changed the video encoder to "H. As widespread support for HEVC/x265 is becoming the normal, how many people are utilizing it to save space with their libraries. To conserve space, first and foremost, make sure you're using x265. 21 votes, 64 comments. In the literal big picture, a 50% avg bitrate loss on HEVC encode is usually unnoticeable to most in terms of quality, and most TVs today add some level of post processing to make up that difference, though some are bad at it. 5gb x265 rarbg copies for all the crap nobody really cares about. Handbrake and x265 it uses are well documented and many tutorials out there. 265 AMD-VCE: 679MB (took 2 min 48 sec to encode) using H. Would animated content (TV shows like South Park, Archer, etc. If you see a 2160p x265 encode movies that's only like 1GB I included 1 for fun research and preset 2 to see what kind of decrease in file size AV1's lowest practical preset has over X265's lowest practical preset. Let's Play! I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the RF vs. Reencoding a BDrip is not ideal for encoding I would say in general I'd trust scene/p2p to make higher quality encoding choices than a streaming service. x265 is an open source implementation of the standard. Leave the normal Bluray-2160p. 264 and H. Personally I could not. Nowadays x265 can do just as good for 1080p or less content. But AV1 is ~30% more efficient. 265, and once my research has finished I'm gonna actually publish a paper and I will post it all over reddit so that people can read the paper and see what the various settings will give them and so forth. x265 is roughly twice as good at 1080p. It depends on how much you notice. 38 GHz, 8 GB RAM. So I use the default 28 on iPhone recordings i've taken, and I bump it up to 30. RARBG x265 encodes Those are a lot better than youd expect given the size. 265/HEVC with x265 I got recommend do all in 10-bit, because x265 have any problem with picture on the 8-bit encode and with 10-bit it should have more effective compression, before few years. so same bitrate x265 as a x264 should be the same quality but x265 be a smaller file size You can't have the same bitrate and a smaller size. ) require a lesser bitrate to achieve "similar" level of quality compared to the x265 is newer and better than x264. I'll reply AGAIN sometime in the future. 42gb and the subtitles are in a separate folder like before. I tried nvenc H265 slowest 2Mbit vs X265 normal 2mbit, and X265 was a bit better in quality. x) wasn't worth it for me. x265 is not an option. x264 and x265 are not codecs, they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). Once upon a time, x264 was the de facto standard for 1080p. x265 Low Quality: siq 6CH. 39GB H264 Blu-ray 1080p As you can see, there is quite a bit of variance above. i always go full Nvenc with i want to download a movie that has 2 options: x265 10bit (29. When I started encode DVD and Blu-Rays to h. will look into remux next time FFmpeg is the leading multimedia framework, able to decode, encode, transcode, mux, demux, stream, filter and play pretty much anything that humans and machines have created. Also fast isn't a particularly well balanced x265 preset, I'd try both veryfast and slow. I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the RF vs. roughly 4-5 fps on slower to 25-30 on slow is a dramatic difference. ahh ic, remux is where its at. I found that using same crf value, the output of preset fast and faster looks pretty similar to my eyes, but with different filesize (the faster preset yields slightly smaller filesize). 9fps on slower. Yes, that's basically correct. 305K subscribers in the PleX community. If you are viewing in a browser, your choices are h. Can anyone explain which I should be going for/why some files are smaller that others of supposedly the same quality and even sometimes lesser quality. 3 under the Video tab there is a Video Codec dropdown - it says H. x265 is good for 4k stuff or 1080p if they used the remuxes as source. I would in general target a VMAF Value of ~96. To give an example, let's say that for live action 1080p video content I aim for 6Mbps (a personal decision). 8bit is standard. More detailed, sharper image. Over the next year or two the GPUs will go from Okay, so question then - I am using version 1. The catch is if you want best quality x265, you need source quality files, so you still have huge file sizes. The normal H265 takes way too much time so I'd rather avoid that. GPUs with NVENC support can encode H. My x264 settings were transparent to the bluray source as far as i could tell, and had an average of about 11. Do whatever makes you feel more comfortable. Way to ruin something great. 264 vs H265, mp4 vs mkv? Help Am I right to store/play my videos in H. e. WEBRip. bit depth: 10bit is larger, less color banding. 1 is my limit If I'm encoding) Those are my handbrake settings. DArker spots looked twice as good on X265. 264 vs h. x265 and x264 is software that encodes video to those standards. This poll is concerning resolutions under 4K. And it was awith my 2080 i tried with. I don't use x265 because it takes more to process than other codecs, but the knowledge that x265 is just fine with a slightly higher quality setting than x264, is helpful to pass onto others. I tried RF30 at level 6. The trade off is that it will be much slower to run, but that is generally an okay sacrifice since you generally only encode videos once for archiving. x265, 1080p. You will need to make sure that you either A have a more powerful playback device or B have a playback device with a dedicated HW decoder. i tried dl'ing the 50gb type files b4, but somehow it will stutter when i play it, like its too heavy for my computer, while the few gb ones will play fine. You probably wouldn't notice a quality difference between that and a good rip to a lossier format, but potentially in the future there will be superior formats that you may wish to use and you will get better results encoding from the original than transcoding from, say, x265. Especially x264/x265 encoders aim to achieve a certain perceptive quality, and bitrate will naturally vary to achieve this. But I do want to make the argument that x265 is not like it was 7 years ago. 4K video) In exchange, it's less supported by hardware devices (because it's newer), and it uses a lot more CPU power to encode and decode. When you want a movie to be 2160p AND x265, set that profile and tag. 265 (x265): 197MB (took 20 min 1 sec to encode) x265 and NvEnc PSNR versus bitrate x265 and NvEnc SSIM versus bitrate x265 and NvEnc VMAF versus bitrate So first take out, is that SSIM, PSNR and VMAF are not consistent within each-others. hjibin iidc upjjhk oye uqnx lcsnc tnowia nkaut iwcdd nlao