Mikrotik vs cisco 2018 reddit. so dont let the EOL thing get to you.
Mikrotik vs cisco 2018 reddit. Cisco/Meraki just works, granted not easily or cheaply.
Mikrotik vs cisco 2018 reddit g. Mikrotik has that, and the RouterOS works brilliantly in that regard. You can look at the test results on the mikrotik website to get a good comparison between routers. Oct 7, 2022 · Mikrotik expects you to know what you want to do, and gives you the features to do it. 5Gb ETH port. So I got the Mikrotik, and one of the main reasons I wanted a 'better' router for home use was to do some stuff with VLANs. For the record, I've not run an Aruba, fortigate, or TP-Link network. Use HW vlans via SwOS or from "Switch" category in RouterOS. You have one 'profile' for all VPN users, doing something like having a different access policy for different users (say internal users vs a vendor), or only allowing a certain group of users if you use AD, is way too convoluted to setup. x firmwares all have huge wifi problems and I have to reboot this elephant suppository at least twice per week. It's closer to how a Cisco and a Juniper would be. there is that. You can also take Cisco Meraki for click click click done. . It is great, great, great, and stable, stable, stable. We've used (at least Ubiquity) in the past successfully and productively for remote sites and I know they have enterprise level type equipment. Infact, you could use any other network equipment OEM to do so as well. The hAP AC2 is a dual chain dual band Wi-Fi all in one router. Say you have two switches, A and B, and two trunks between them, 1 and 2. MikroTik switch have more settings and it’s more comfortable to use. I'm most interested in wireless performance of both routers as most of my devices home due to lack of possibility to hardwire them directly to the router will have to have ONLY wireless connectivity: Yea, virtual is better because it's 64 bit. ServeTheHome has gotten me exposed to Mikrotik though, and I found the CRS312-4C+8XG-RM (8x10gb RJ45, 4x10gb RJ45/SFP combos) which can be bought from a Canadian retailer. I got a Cisco 3750X for like $100 and it’s more reliable than either my UniFi or MikroTik stuff. Tplink and engenius are good for very tight budgets. The company was founded in 96, but I believe work on RouterOS development started a little before that. Is a vlan which you can create on top of the interface. MikroTik is not focusing on firewalls or network security the way Cisco or Fortinet is. It’s not like your usual consumer router. Ok, if I accept what you say as true, I've been debating an architectural choice for awhile now. The ER-X, for example, can do dynamic routing protocols, even with IPv6 (ie, OSPFv3 etc), and a host of other enterprise type of features. I've already set the ESXI host Vswitch and network to promiscuous mode. I just did a new preschool the district was not going to shell out or extend the cisco network and phone systems since it is another campus and only going to be around for 4 or 5 years. I've tested first hand on v1. com The rest weren’t much better, and their configuration mechanisms are asinine compared to Cisco, HP, or Juniper. Ubiquiti routers don't have a great track record. I did know my ISP sometimes connect to the router they offer to config things, but this is the first time I saw my router log show there is someone tried to connect to my router with different user name and they Just to note: There are tons of YT tutorials online now a days, so learning how to configure a Mikrotik device should be a breeze in this day & age. But MikroTik WiFi was not so good as unifi. so dont let the EOL thing get to you. trying to move an access point because it looks ugly and repurposing freshly vacant network port for something else e. PoE is not a deal breaker, just an added bonus if we move to VoIP. Newer Mikrotik devices like the CRS 3xx series switches and some routers with switch chips(I think the HAP ac2 is included) support bridge hardware offload. Personally, I'd focus on the Cisco path for now if that's what you run at your network core. But Mikrotik is such a pretty tiny box with a wonderful GUI and CLI. The Cisco autonomous APs are worth another look as they have AP clustering that does not require a WLC. The RB4011 was released in 2018, the 3011 2015, and I got a MikroTik router and Cisco switch working. I would not consider it something you need to have. Because I can quickly work with it and controllers/platform consistency I find more important for APs than route/switch. However Mikrotik place their trust in the user to make a correct decision they are buying correct hardware for the job. Cisco/Meraki just works, granted not easily or cheaply. Cisco or HP, hah, just try using a non-branded SFP module and watch it reject it. Enterprise Networking -- Routers, switches, wireless, and firewalls. Please ensure if you're asking a question you have checked the Wiki First: https://help. Which you definitely need for a router. This has forced me to replace all the switches with Cisco or Mikrotik switches. CISCO is CISCO, no matter what a Mikrotik fan could say(me). That's the beauty of Mikrotik. I am looking to migrate my current networking infrastructure (OPNsense + Cisco SG300-52) to Mikrotik, and I am unsure of the setup I had in mind. MikroTik being a low-end brand is more focused on entry-level ISP/homelab/SMB gear, etc. Example: Set up a Mikrotik that uses WiFi for WAN when the car is at the building, and fails over to 4G USB adapter when away from the building. As someone who holds all of the MikroTik certs as well as CCNA/CCNP, I'd say you have to think about what each is designed to do MikroTik's certs are mainly designed to teach you configuration - the "how" Cisco's certs are designed to teach you configuration, validation and some theory as to "why" Hi everyone, I`m currently in the market for a new Mikrotik router for home. You don't want that old Cisco router unless you are trying to learn the Cisco CLI with an eye on a Cisco certification. In that post I mentioned that the only 1G copper module I have been able to get to work with my Mikrotik devices is the one that Mikrotik sells, which is here: The symptom is that the switch gets hot and the fans never turn on (they spin up at power-on). The beauty of mikrotik for me personally is affordability of their products with rather good quality and performance that meets my requirements. Planning on connecting it via SFP to an Ubiquiti US-48-750W switch to 40 or so connections (rooms, APs, Sonos, IP cameras and the rest). The RB5009UG+S+IN - does not. I’m really happy with the result. learning cisco allowed me to look at other router platforms and understand what was going on. I'm in the process of trying to retire an old Cisco router and replace it with a new CCR, but I need to do some VLANing for this and am a little unsure of my configuration here. 8. I'll take the cheapest mikrotik routeros device compared to the most expensive cisco device you can buy, and I'll have thousands more possible configuration options and custom solutions that I could provide with the mikrotik vs the cisco device. 7 and running into some questions with VLANs. Meraki. For purely cellular we've seen some smart offshore deployments using Pepwave Max HD series hardware and SpeedFusion to allow pretty much seamless network access at a Mikrotik CLI is. But the software interface is not that nice. It's a little bit confusing and Mikrotik is trying to merge 2 & 3. MSTP should be used in cases of VLANs assigned to the bridge. the cisco courses in my experience are exhaustive of what you need to know in networking, although i found it hard to follow at first. The Mikrotik has an extra RJ45 port if I remember correctly, so that's a plus. com It's usually ease of use vs price vs performance, with any two of those outweighing the third. Cisco 2960s not silent out of the box but easy to fan mod it :) only uses like 30w of power too for the full IOS experience. Even using their WIFI AP's despite what people say lol. I understand you can run RouterOS and have some layer 3 functionality, but it's very underpowered for layer 3 and you would have a very substantial performance hit. Personally the best method is to not just go with one brand anyway. MikroTik knows the people who use their switches/Wi-Fi but need a "firewall" will just use pfSense or OPNsense, so they don't feel a need to compete. What is your desired usage? That will be a deciding factor I think. mikrotik. com Assuming an existing VM host, running a VM router adds the least amount of additional wires, space consumed, and complexity at least in terms of getting out-of-band access to it (via a VNC console to the VM, while a separate small x86 or ARM router box will not have IPMI). Now having switches that you can access from the same console, with the same knowledge you already have to get with the routers, makes it an easy choice for the switches as well. See here: Auto channel selection - how does it decide? I would find the best channel by looking at things like noise floor, and real world throughput tests. Hi, I read around that many users complain that Mikrotik hasn't yet implemented such a mDNS feature on their devices. Mikrotik is unlimited connections until you max your equipment. With unifi a have stable 40mb. not easy. CRS are L2 switches (models 3XX) which can do most of L2 at linerate and then they can do anything L3 but using their weak CPU, do not buy Mikrotik switchs to work as routers. They make good stuff. Ubiquiti is Ok if you like click click click, done. This includes myself. Keys for me are ease of use with deep extensibility where I need it. I have one of the Mikrotiks behind me and it's solid but it does sound like the Cisco is a bit fit for you. I'd put them on par with mikrotik as far as performance goes. Mikrotik, and Mikrotik consistently exhibits subtle flaws that result in sub-optimal routing or even broken behavior such as routing loops, or backup default GWs that can only be released manually. We bought about 20 APs too so have approx 80 in prod. And need to decide between the 3 models in the Title. Expect to be reading up on a lot of wiki pages if you go that route, but Mikrotik stuff is truly a set-and-forget installation. There was a learning curve with the Mikrotik router, but there are plenty of resources online to guide you through the concepts and It means that Mikrotik RouterOS is loaded with routing features meant to enable things when you are running a large scale network. Brace yourselves, because it's Traditional Cisco vs. MikroTik CCR1009 vs CCR2004 vs CCR1016 - Small time ISP. I have experience with Cisco networking gear, but know this is out of their price range - so I wanted to take a look at Ubiquiti, mainly due to a lot of positive comments on reddit. Then there is switchOS from Mikrotik, which is overly simplistic. MikroTik CRS326-24G-2S+RM ($294). As a former network and back office telco engineer for almost 8 years, I've always missed the console configuration you can do on devices. If I go with something like Mikrotik/Ubiquity - life would be a lot easier for me and for them. It has a lot (I mean LOT) of professional and business features, and a few consumer ones. Decided to mak a small config for my office, and have a whirl - since I have a new office and need some networking gear anyhow. Yes there are differences between Cisco Catalyst vs Cisco Nexus vs Cisco Small Business vs Cisco Meraki. com I've configured and maintained Freeradius for a lot of things. I have deployed a few ubiquiti APs and imho they're difficult to compare with mikrotik, as they differ quite a bit in what "experience" they offer: While you are able to configure the mikrotik stuff on a very detailed level, the ubiquiti ones are pretty much a solid plug and play experience with good performance for low setup effort - vice Mikrotik if you need advanced granulated settings and don't care about fancy interfaces with fancy stats and charts. Ignoring all costs (I already own both sets of hardware), would you go with three Mellanox ConnectX-4 Lx 50 GbE single port cards in a ROCE v2 IPv6 configuration with ASAP2 Open vSwitch integration, or three ConnectX-3 VPI single port cards in an InfiniBand FDR configuration with IPv6 over InfiniBand? The difference is CPU speed (same chipset, but ax2 is much smaller, with worse thermal capacity, so underclocked), plus one 2. I think you get four options: not a member, add if missing, leave as is, or always strip. I placed a USG Pro for a customer which currently is having SIP issues and then you experience the closed ecosystem of Ubiquiti Mikrotik has a few as well, but they can be patched with firewall rules and security updates. I love Mikrotik routers. How do they compare in ease of setup and security? Or is there a better SMB router with built in wifi like the Cisco RV180W or CRS125-24G1S2Hn? I spent a few hours comparing simple topologies with Cisco vs. A community-contributed subreddit for all things Mikrotik. It can handle thousands of simultaneous logins, hundreds of thousands of accounting records per hour, is extremely easy to set up in a clustered or multi-server configuration with an LDAP, MySQL, PostgreSQL backend, etc. I just bought an EOL Cisco switch. But for the rural deployments, with poor connectivity, they're definitely worth considering. For Mikrotik, if the SFP module electrically functions, it will use it. Once you love it, you may deploy a CloudHostedRouter (RouterOS) in a VM just like any other router VM. Jan 14, 2014 · I am looking for an alternative, but have never worked with MikroTik Routers. 9. mikrotik can get very specific and advanced but is WAY more capable and flexible. It took me a while to figure things out. Things like dynamic protocols (many of them), CLI access for automation, API's, implementation of specific routing features etc = all meant for participation in a large interconnected network. I got into kind of a heated argument with some cisco sycophants. It isn't bad, although it really can't hold a candle so something like Zabbix, PRTG, or LibreNMS. Looking at Mikrotik RouterOS and it's VLAN configuration from a Cisco user perspective it is the exact opposite of a straight forward configuration and imho overly complicated. As others have said though, there's very little hand-holding. Accounting is also very robust, and easy to parse for the Hello all, I passed CCNA two weeks ago, and now I am thinking of starting CCNA security, or a MTCNA course. The Mikrotik OS has more built in options with the ability to use 4G cards and wireless adapters in so many different ways. I went with Omada, I have a gateway, switch, 3 big wifi base stations, 1 outdoor base station, 2 wall base stations, a bunch of phones and some security cameras. I set up seven VLANs, trunk works, access to Internet works, just need to configure the firewall rules to lock down the inter-vlan routing. Also, if you're small(business) and need more features, Mikrotik is the right choice, hard to configure because bad documentation. Round 1: Setup & Ease of Use Traditional Cisco solutions are like those massive Lego sets with a gazillion pieces. Cheap, sturdy, incredibly powerful for the cost. Directing an external fan at the switch resolves the issue. 🤭 And: thanks for all the downvotes —- Need a router, prebuilt with low power draw, has SFP. MikroTik as a company started with RouterOS and they didn't make hardware devices at first. Basically I'm trying to determine which switch can in theory handle the most traffic. A the speed was not stable. Both of the above would also need the MikroTik CRS305-1G-4S+IN ($217) so that I can have 4 SFP+ ports. For example you have ether1 connected to an external switch via trunk port with two separate networks and you want mikrotik to be connected to thies networks. 4. I have nothing against Mikrotik. The biggest caveat is that they're unintuitive - I'm more comfortable on a Cisco CLI than I am in Mikrotik's GUI, especially for their routers (and I haven't touched Cisco iOS in ~five years). It looks like the the rb2011 is better than the hap, but so is the hex Poe and that would save you a little money. Heck, even Sonicwall charges $50/user for just their SSLVPN component. I run Unifi at home, granted, not your usual home setup but rather 10gig fiber to desktops and switches, POE to 4 APs. You'll want to look at the small business access points, which will put you in about the same price range as the others. If they poached a couple Ubiquiti UX folks to make "quick setup" options for some basic tasks, I'd never need to buy other networking equipment for my lab. Honestly, used enterprise gear on eBay is a better deal. Cisco, Juniper, Arista, Fortinet, and more You may regret Mikrotik (non-point to point) indoor WiFi devices compared to Ubiquiti Unifi APs: worse wireless latency performance worse wireless stability in latency, throughput and client connections, especially in 2. People who are very heavy into Mikrotik, like WISPS who also use Mikrotik for their last-mile internet delivery to customers, tend to use The Dude more commonly. I have a lot of Mikrotik gear in my home. a personal laptop shared with family members including those just old enough to download game cracks, warez and porn. As an everyday home router, that thing is a potential security risk and a power hog. Mikrotik only has a handful of switches models running the same OS and they can’t make the CLI to configure basic Layer 2 switching the same. also price/performance is better with MT still easy of use -> UBNT and i live and work in a world where i drive cisco, mikrotik and ubnt on a daily basis ;) Once all makes more sense, a mikrotik device becomes a tool you use to design your network. General ISP and network discussion also permitted. I'm not proud of how many times I've had to reset my mikrotik to get back into the interface, but it's far more capable than pfSense so I have a lot of incentive to keep messing with it for fun to challenge myself and learn more. They are the best bang for the buck. Edit: I was wrong; that happens when Mikrotik uses product names that very much look-alike 🤣 The RB5009UPr+S+IN has PoE out. My 2cents on mikrotik. If your not familiar with routers go for CISCO, it could be easy to find support and documentation. Because MikroTik is feature rich there is also a fairly steep learning curve. Greetings! So we are a small ISP who is moving over for a new fibre project of 50-200 homes to start, then expending up to 25,000 homes. Hi Guys, I'm putting through a purchase with my supplier after realising I've completely run out of spare / emergency units. The Dude is a monitoring system. TP-Link TL-SG3428X ($450). I have two Mikrotik CRS309-1G-8S+, one CSS326-24G-2S+ and one CRS305-1G-4S+. Lack of options mostly. I've been working with Mikrotik gear for a while now and up until this point I really haven't had to do anything VLAN related on RouterOS. The problem is that while 12x10gb is enough 10GbE for me for the next while, it's most certainly not enough ports in general to cover all devices I need to hook up. So CLI logic for Vyos and Cisco Catalyst being a logic I know and can setup without a learning curve works for me. But these switch platforms came from different acquisitions and are running different OS. I know I could get the MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM but that's $580 AUD and I have no need for POE at all. Will move Cisco out of site with FortiWifi to cover my extension plans until DNA licenses expire. So if all your users should have the same level of access, it's probably fine. MikroTik CSS326-24G-2S+RM ($212). Their licenses are paid, but a full-speed 'trial' one should work eternally. I want to experiment with FortiWifi on one site for 12 months rather than replace/buy more APs to extend network in all our sites. As a lot of others have stated, it depends on your use case. com Stay far away from the CCR2004 line though. Hello, I'm about to replace an old TP-Link Wireless router with some of those models: Cisco RV160W or Mikrotik hAP ac2 . I made an earlier post about my experience with various SFP and SFP+ 1G and 10G modules, both copper and fiber, in Mikrotik routers and switches; that earlier post is . I'm using Mikrotik for routing, Cisco and Mikrotik for switching and Unifi for Wireless. On paper the hAP ac 2 looks like a better wired router, but after researching it on the Mikrotik forums, it seems to have very poor WiFi performance and may be suffering from other technical issues due to being a new architecture (ARM) and new product for Mikrotik. I usually just keep a… As far as the router, I ordered the Mikrotik HAP ac2 after going back and forth many times between Mikrotik and Ubiquiti. The most common „attacker“ in such places is an employee cutting corners e. 3 and v1. Ubiquiti is more user friendly. Mikrotik does have a learning curve though. CCR are routers, Mikrotik do not use specific ASIC (minus IPSec encryption) on their equipment soy the route as fast as their cores can. As an example, their switch OS allows you to change the tagging behavior of each VLAN individually, per port. We have Mikrotik, DELL and HP switches (10G, 40G, 100G). Anyway Cisco licensing is a huge over priced pain in the ass IMO. Cisco WS-C3650-48PS-L Cisco WS-3750G-48PS (older gen 3750) MikroTik CRS226-2S-RM Ubiquiti Edge Switch ES-24-500W Ok, so as you can probably see some are PoE. I used Cisco so much in my work and i migrate it to CRS. Anyconnect. I've got the CHR VM up and running with a single network interface connected to a VMware vswitch physically connected to Cisco switch configured as a trunk port with vlan 1 native. We've gone over to Aruba with our core in a previous refresh so I was leaning towards them so as not to have multiple vendors for switching. They are much easier to configure than mikrotik, however. After you get used to it, it's not bad but I personally far prefer the Ubiquiti CLI. Yes. RouterOS gives you all the features you know and love in Mikrotik. As for some of the other stuff, VLANs are a little bit strange, but with some decent Google-Fu, you should be able to find your way. 4GHz If you can run a network that's all MikroTik and it fits your requirements, that's awesome! But there are definitely protocols and features that aren't in MikroTik and often some of the networks I get hired to clean up tried to use MikroTik in a role that it didn't work well in - like using MikroTik where a switch stack would be better. Mikrotik expects you to know what you want to do, and gives you the features to do it. After using MikroTik and Unifi WiFi/switch I vote for MikroTik router, switch and unifi wifi. I would really appreciate some feedback! Initially, I was thinking of getting a dedicated router/firewall appliance and a dedicated switch. The fact that meraki turns into a brick if you don't pay a license is ridiculous. Buckle up, because we're about to embark on an epic, slightly tongue-in-cheek journey through the wilderness of Cisco networking solutions. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now new MikroTik RB5009 (Backordered till end of December) ($200) Cisco, Juniper, Arista, Fortinet ESP32 is a series of low cost, low power system on a chip microcontrollers with integrated Wi-Fi and dual-mode Bluetooth. MikroTik is known for being very versatile and having enterprise features at commodity prices. Whether it's $10 or $1000 you generally get most of the features. In my set up with a lot of others AP’s a cant reach more than 25mb speed in 2. Hello, I'm trying out Mikrotik CHR on ESXI 6. It's been OK for home (client count is around 300, mostly IoT) but I'd never deploy Unifi in production to 200 employees even though We were debating between Cisco vs Aruba, it was very contentious to say the least because well, people were mostly used to the Cisco way of things, which was understandable. com with the ZFS community as well. At this moment, I have an ISP issued router, WifI6, FiberToHome, however I can`t use an SFP module directly for the Mikrotik router, so I will have to put the ISP router into Bridge mode, and it has a 2. I've just never seen a job description listing Mikrotik certifications as a "must have". Even a $50 router will have some features that a $2k Cisco router won't. 7. 0 with poor results. Mikrotik has been awesome. The choice is really yours. MikroTik was made after Lativa's independence in 1991 to eliminate their reliance on Russian products. It was never really stable, but the 1. Whereas Mikrotik is closer to how Nokia/Alcatel Lucent are. I decided to rebuild my home network recently without consumer type equipment and gave a go to Mikrotik (RB5009Upr) and TP-Link Omada for the WiFi (multiple PoE wall plates). The 2960CX is still a great switch and I like that it’s passively cooled. So. Turns out VLANs are a nightmare on Mikrotik, or at least it's very difficult to wrap your head around. The CCNA Security course will last for 9 weeks (3. It is replace for couple years old Cisco EA3500 which have a problem with wifi connection. Mikrotik devices give you far greater flexibility. Mikrotik has a lot of powerful features, but I find the web interface to be complicated. Networking experts reply that you can do without it and use IGMP proxy instead, expecially because it is safer than running a mDNS repeater on your network, in particular if you already have the traffic segragated in different subnets. MSTP has a specific use case where blocking is done per VLAN. 5 hours per week), it costs 200 $, and the certification another 300 $. pfSense for my firewall to keep it simple and make sure I don't fuck up my whole network while I play with RouterOS behind it on my LAN. tl;dr cisco is a good place to start. In addition I have two Cisco SG300-10. My router is a Dream Machine, but I regret buying this piece of crap. We have three or four of those and they like to self-reboot. the Mikrotik also has 2 x SFP+ ports to 10Gbe connectivity but again if that might not of any interest to you where as it sounds like the POE of the Cisco would be of greater value. My background is mostly Cisco so I'm going the Vyos+used Cisco switch+ Unifi AP route. Mikrotik; I like your products but product names is something to improve on. The one saving grace: Mikrotik reboots are multiple orders of magnitude quicker than Cisco, or a Palo Alto in a similar price range. Oct 8, 2021 · When choosing routing software, Cisco and Mikrotik are the preferred software users can get, but which one is best for you? Despite the high cost, Cisco has become a well-known software brand in all walks of life due to its consistency and reliability. I'm sure EdgeOS works also, but Mikrotik seems to have some nice features, even compared to Cisco or Juniper. The ESP32 series employs either a Tensilica Xtensa LX6, Xtensa LX7 or a RiscV processor, and both dual-core and single-core variations are available. Good lord no. But don't use SW bridge vlans, it drastically slows down performance. I'd suggest against searching for "Cisco -> Mikrotik" type things, just search for how to do the thing in Mikrotik, remembering that they tend to use very generic, standards based terms. 1, v1. and their switches are a bit expensive (or was last time I looked) I have got Mikrotik/Cisco/HP even Netgear. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. However the Mikrotik Windox GUI configurator is amazing. EIGRP (mikrotik could have or be getting this now that it's an open protocol) Otherwise the mikrotik is worlds faster (1200mbps on a gig mikroT, vs 150mbps on the ASA5505) and has a ton more features, and cheap enough to buy 3, 1 for production, 1 for failover, and one as a cold spare. Ended up with a small setup, like this: Enterprise Networking Design, Support, and Discussion. ;) Like, a CCR2004 can reboot and be alive again under a minute most of the time. It scans all available channels (once) and picks the one with the fewest devices on that channel. I just like it. practicalzfs. Unless you decide for an Edge router which requires more than a few clicks. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse. Mikrotik+Unifi lite is a good combo in terms of Poe being able to power your APs about 150, but I'm not sure of Ubiquiti's power standards from the router You wouldn't deploy core network and they can work out expensive vs other options. A bridge in Mikrotik can be a virtual or physical interface depending on your hardware and configuration. SwitchOS keeps it simple. Mikrotik Switches (CRS) is pretty great. I gave up my ASUS router in 2014 and haven’t looked back. Cisco CBS350 8 ports with external power: 235€ Cisco C1000 8 ports: 318€ Cisco SG250 8 ports: 117€ Aruba Instant On 1930 8 ports: 130€ Aruba Instant On 1930 24 ports: 350€ Mikrotik CRS326-24G-2S-RM: 160€ Unifi Switch US-24: 234€ UniFi USW-24 switch: 290€ No, MikroTik is the Swiss Army Knife of the industry. Mikrotik usually wins for price/performance and stability, but is severely lacking in features and community support. 5 Gig port replacing 1 Gig port but losing PoE-in in the process, USB port and external antennas on ax3. Wouldnt use EOL firewalls/security stuff but for a switch its not a huge risk in a homelab. right now, I'd say it's 6 of one, and a half-dozen of the other. Cisco/Meraki are for large businesses that don't care about money. If you have any experience with Cisco, Huawei, Juniper or Vyatta router concepts, it should be easy enough to learn. I still run into plenty of experienced IT pros who have never even heard of Mikrotik. mzfzlgllihxsbyuppuirjdonugyurrtgsjkihteeqeevsnhueoz